Cittaslow Sonoma? / That "Vision Thing"

Since no Indian artifacts were found during the initial archeological examination it is unlikely that development on that lot can be stopped - UNLESS you want it to be a park and are willing to make a Really Big Stink about it.

I am heartened to see that the July 2007 EIR for the project would require contractors to recycle waste, deal with dust and noise, requires a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and a post-development plan for surface water runoff. That's a lot of trouble and expense.

But, IF that vacant lot is developed anything built there will be around for a VERY long time - we better get it right.

Since this is 2010, why can't we be building the most energy efficient projects possible with:

1. Solar photovoltaic and hot water arrays
2. Windows with a size and location that respond to solar conditions: with large overhangs above south windows (covered porches anyone?) and small windows to the east and west
3. Rain water collection to use during the initial planting period
4. Sustainable landscaping with Native plants that require no watering and fruit/vegetable/nut trees that allow for interaction of residents with the landscaping and provide a food source (Cittaslow)
   
5. Why can’t we resurrect the historic artesian well on the property, at least as a decorative fountain?
6. We can exceed the LEED guidelines limiting the chemicals in paints, carpets adhesives.
7. Require efficient windows, heating systems, etc. using QUALITY construction and 'green' methodologies
8. And most especially, in order to maintain the existing character of the block why can’t we have buildings that are architecturally compatible between two historic properties and the residential nature of historic East Spain and 2nd Streets East
   

Why can't we have a project we could be really proud of?